Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;261:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.11.028

Table 1.

Model performance for each patient and model, displayed via balanced accuracy values and the sensitivity for “Math” and for “Non-Math” (in brackets, respectively). Those values represent averages over the 10 folds.

MKL model Patient P1 Patient P2 Patient P3
Full 89.51 (88.06–90.96) 87.18 (85.49–88.89) 76.80 (72.89–80.71)
δ 73.48 (69.25–77.71) 82.25 (81.18–83.33) 72.36 (69.01–75.71)
θ 70.92 (68.66–73.16) 79.89 (78.43–81.35) 73.08 (69.37–76.79)
α 75.28 (71.64–78.92) 75.57 (71.37–79.76) 75.03 (70.77–79.29)
β 66.88 (64.18–69.58) 78.50 (78.04–78.97) 69.18 (65.14–73.21)
low-γ 85.61 (84.18–87.05) 81.07 (79.61–82.54) 68.81 (66.20–67.57)
high-γ 88.92 (86.27–86.86) 88.37 (87.45–89.29) 69.50 (69.37–69.64)