Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;261:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.11.028

Table 3.

Top 10 ranking electrode-frequency band combinations for each patient, according to dm averaged across folds.

Patient P1
Patient P2
Patient P3
Band Elec dm (%) Band Elec dm (%) Band Elec dm (%)
high-γ 27 17.14 high-γ 97 03.40 high-γ 63 06.43
low-γ 27 03.81 β 74 03.07 α 23 05.88
high-γ 18 03.47 high-γ 83 02.89 θ 23 05.71
high-γ 32 02.54 high-γ 67 02.78 δ 44 04.00
β 14 02.38 high-γ 60 02.56 θ 65 03.29
α 17 02.04 high-γ 62 02.13 β 44 03.17
low-γ 13 01.98 α 63 02.09 θ 16 02.91
high-γ 04 01.92 high-γ 84 01.93 low-γ 63 02.27
low-γ 15 01.68 β 63 01.85 high-γ 69 01.71
θ 20 01.47 high-γ 11 01.80 δ 66 01.67