Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Aug;136(2):350–362. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001455

Table 5. Detailed Overview of the Cephalometric Analysis for the Human Cadaver FJTT.

Intraoperative vs. Posttransplant Planned vs. Posttransplant


Parameter Value Difference from Postoperative Value % Deviation from Postoperative Value Parameter Value Difference from Planned % Deviation from Planned
Distance measures, mm Go–B 1.03 1.25 Go–B 1.03 1.27
Go–Me 2.49 3.02 Go–Me 2.49 3.11
S–Na 0.52 0.78 S–Na 0.52 0.79
Zy–Zy 0.82 0.63 Zy–Zy 0.82 0.62
Op–Na 3.55 2.60 Op–Na 3.55 2.67
Overjet 0.39 10.42 Overjet 0.86* 18.84*
Overbite 3.65 197.94 Overbite 0.89* 93.40*
B–A 5.31 14.86 B–A 1.75 5.15
Me–ANS 4.38 6.93 Me–ANS 1.24 2.00
Me–Na 5.98 5.18 Me–Na 5.98 5.47
Me-ANS/Me-Na 1.01% 1.84 Me-ANS/Me-Na 1.86% 3.28
S–A 2.2 2.80 S–A 0.19 0.24
S–R 0.72 0.97 S–R 1.2 1.59
Op–R 1.3 0.96 Op–R 0.35 0.26
Angle measures, degrees BSA 2.07 deg 11.05 BSA 0.09 deg 0.49
ANB 1.16 deg 38.99 ANB 1.25 deg 29.65
SNB 3.03 deg 4.11 SNB 3.03 deg 3.95
SNA 4.27 deg 5.57 SNA 4.33 deg 5.35

FJTT, face-jaw-teeth transplantation.

*

These deviations represent an improvement in outcome [i.e., the obtained outcome was closer to normal range of 0–2 mm (Marchac D, Arnaud E. Midface surgery from Tessier to distraction. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;15:681–694) than the planned].

Note that Me–ANS/Me–Na parameter was not used in the calculations to avoid redundant calculations.

Unless mentioned, the parameters were measured in millimeters.