. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Fam Issues. 2014 Jan 24;37(4):443–465. doi: 10.1177/0192513X13520156

Table 2.

Odds Ratios for the Logistic Regression of Intimate Partner Violence in Young Adulthood (N = 625)

	Zero Order	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 4
	e^b	e^b	e^b	e^b	e^b
Parents’ negativity about dating	1.15^***	1.10^*	1.09^*	1.09^*	1.08
Mediators
Parent-child conflict about dating	1.22^**		1.20^*		1.19^*
Child gender mistrust	1.81^***			1.52^**	1.49^*
Traditional Parenting Factors
Parental support	0.82	1.00	1.00	.97	.98
Parental control	0.83	0.85	.85	.86	.86
Coercive parenting	1.60^**	1.55^*	1.58^*	1.48^*	1.51^*
Contextual Risk Factors
Early dater (parental report)	1.62^*	1.04	1.01	1.03	1.01
Juvenile delinquency	1.28	1.04	1.03	1.00	.98
Adolescent dating violence	2.39^***	2.00^**	1.98^**	1.98^**	1.97^**
Neighborhood context (disorder/violence)	1.04^*	.98	.98	.98	.98
Sociodemographic Characteristics
Age	1.05	.96	.97	.96	.97
Female	0.79	.66^*	.62^*	.64^*	.60^**
Race/ethnicity
(White)
Black	2.00^***	1.67	1.71^*	1.57	1.60
Hispanic	2.52^***	1.82	1.84^*	1.76	1.79
Family structure
(Two biological parents)
Single parent	1.19	.73	.76	.69	.72
Step-parent	1.70^*	1.34	1.34	1.21	1.22
Other living arrangement	2.17^*	1.20	1.18	1.06	1.05
Mother’s education
Less than 12 years	2.09^**	1.59	1.55	1.60	1.56
(High school graduate)
More than 12 years	.95	1.08	1.08	1.11	1.10
Relationship type
(Dating)
Cohabiting	2.32^***	1.62^*	1.62^*	1.56	1.56
Married	2.03^*	1.57	1.60	1.62	1.64
Current relationship	1.09	.67	.65	.67	.66
Relationship duration	1.30^***	1.32^***	1.32^***	1.33^***	1.33^***
Constant

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001

Source: Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study