Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 14;291(8):3682–3692. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.678052

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Comparison of tetrameric interfaces with a previously validated trimeric interface. A, schematic representations of a trimeric interface previously validated by cross-linking (35) and two previously proposed tetrameric configurations from functional studies of covalently linked concatemers (16). Cross-linking data from Collier et al. (41) suggest a trimeric clockwise topology of αγβ (35). These data also agree with two coexisting functional tetrameric configurations. Intersubunit angles vary slightly between trimer and tetramer models, resulting in slightly different interfaces as follows: in clockwise order, αβ, βγ, and γα, in addition to two unique interfaces to tetramers α1α2 and α1γ. B, schematic representation of α2β and α2γ interfaces in the tetramer model α1βα2γ. Shown as sticks, βV85 can cross-link with αLys-477, and γGlu-455 can cross-link with αLeu-120. Cross-linkers are represented as red bars.