Table 2.
Characteristic | Physicians (N = 182)
|
Nurses (N = 347)
|
P-valueb
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | ||
Gender | <0.001 | ||||
Female | 79 | 43 | 294 | 85 | |
Male | 103 | 57 | 53 | 15 | |
Age (in years) | <0.001 | ||||
≤30 | 49 | 27 | 184 | 53 | |
31–45 | 73 | 40 | 130 | 38 | |
46–59 | 44 | 24 | 29 | 8 | |
≥60 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 1 | |
Years since graduation | <0.001 | ||||
≤5 | 66 | 37 | 194 | 56 | |
6–15 | 54 | 30 | 117 | 34 | |
≥15 | 60 | 33 | 33 | 10 | |
Hours worked per week | <0.001 | ||||
<40 | 82 | 46 | 79 | 23 | |
≥40 | 98 | 54 | 267 | 77 | |
Patients seen per week | <0.001 | ||||
≤50 | 33 | 19 | 138 | 43 | |
51–150 | 102 | 57 | 160 | 49 | |
>150 | 43 | 24 | 26 | 8 | |
Region | 0.07 | ||||
North | 11 | 6 | 17 | 5 | |
Northeast | 49 | 27 | 125 | 36 | |
Central-West | 21 | 11 | 21 | 6 | |
Southeast | 65 | 36 | 109 | 31 | |
South | 36 | 20 | 75 | 22 | |
Knowledge and attitudes regarding CRC screening | |||||
Perception of INCA recommendations for CRC screening as very influential | 64 | 40 | 106a | 37a | 0.54 |
More familiar with FOBT | 133 | 77 | 112 | 33 | <0.001 |
More familiar with sigmoidoscopy | 88 | 51 | 36 | 11 | <0.001 |
Perception of FOBT as very effective | 96 | 56 | 222a | 75a | <0.001 |
Perception of sigmoidoscopy as very effective | 141 | 82 | 274a | 92a | <0.01 |
Perception of colonoscopy as very effective | 163 | 94 | 309 | 97 | 0.22 |
CRC screening practices | |||||
Age of routine CRC screening initiation | <0.001 | ||||
<50 | 34 | 19 | 61 | 18 | |
50–55 | 52 | 30 | 47 | 14 | |
56–61 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
62–67 | 2 | 1 | 0 | – | |
Other | 1 | 1 | 9 | 2 | |
I do not conduct CRC screening | 83 | 47 | 220 | 65 |
CRC: colorectal cancer; INCA: Brazilian National Cancer Institute; FOBT: fecal occult blood test.
Over 10% of observations are missing.
P-value for comparison between sample characteristics of physicians and nurses.