Table 4.
Comparison of compressed file sizes of MetaCRAM-Huffman using 2 rounds and 1 round
| Data | Original (MB) | MCH-2rounds (MB) | Align. % | MCH-1round (MB) | Align. % | gzip (MB) | MFComp (MB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERR321482 | 1429 | 191 | 29.6 | 192 | 27 | 408 | 229 |
| SRR359032 | 3981 | 319 | 61.8 | 315 | 57.7 | 1133 | 263 |
| ERR532393 | 8230 | 948 | 46.8 | 952 | 45.8 | 2366 | 1126 |
| SRR1450398 | 5399 | 703 | 7.7 | 707 | 7.1 | 1532 | 726 |
| SRR062462 | 6478 | 137 | 2.7 | 143 | 2.6 | 356 | 161 |
For short hand notation, we used“MCH-2rounds” = MetaCRAM-Huffman with 2 rounds, “MCH-1round” = MetaCRAM-Huffman with 1 round. We also used the shortcut “MFComp” = MFCompress and “Align. %” refers to the percentage of reads aligned during 2 rounds and 1 round, respectively, for MCH-2rounds and MCH-1round