Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 10;283(1824):20152676. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2676

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Evidence of attractive and retentive effects of the group on individual larval behaviour. Resting time (s) of tracked L. sericata larvae on the Winner spot (a) and outside + Loser spot (c) as a function of the number of individuals on the Winner spot. Resting time (s) of tracked C. vomitoria larvae on the Winner spot (b) and outside + Loser spot (d) as a function of the number of individuals on the Winner spot. For all boxplots, the first 10 min were removed to reach a plateau regarding the accumulation of individuals on the Winner spot (figure 2b). The red crosses represent the means. N represents the number of elements. No significant differences were observed in all boxplots according to the species (KW tests: (a) KW = 4.99, p = 0.17; (b) KW = 4.77, p = 0.17; (c) KW = 6.19, p = 0.19; (d) (KW = 13.73, p = 0.003, Dunn's test, p > 0.05 for all multiple paired comparisons). For trials in which aggregations were observed outside of either spot (L. sericata, N = 2; C. vomitoria, N = 4), the mean resting times of the individuals on the Winner spot were 75 ± 112 s for L. sericata and 17.9 ± 13 s for C. vomitoria. On the Loser spot, the corresponding times were 30 ± 22 s for L. sericata and 18.6 ± 10 s for C. vomitoria. The larvae spent less time on a spot when the number of individuals on the spot was low (means ± s.d. throughout the experiment: Winner spot: L. sericata: 6.8 ± 3.5; C. vomitoria: 2 ± 1.5; Loser spot: L. sericata: 3.7 ± 4; C. vomitoria: 2.4 ± 2) (for comparison, see values in the text regarding trials yielding a collective choice for one spot). (Online version in colour.)