Table 3.
Training Frac. | Testing performance |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Join | SIMA | MW | MWG | MWM | |
000 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
020 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
040 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.81 |
060 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
080 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.78 |
100 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.78 |
Note: For each training fraction, the reported testing performance is the average of individual F1 scores from the testing fractions. The top-performing method (highest F1 score) is highlighted in bold.