Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 2;31(12):1999–2006. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv072

Table 4.

Multiple-fractions experiment results for the P2 dataset

Training fraction Testing performance
Join SIMA MW MWG MWM
000 0.62 0.64 0.61 0.48 0.61
020 0.58 0.56 0.55 0.43 0.55
040 0.52 0.56 0.56 0.41 0.56
080 0.56 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.57
100 0.63 0.57 0.56 0.44 0.57

Notes: For each training fraction, the reported testing performance is the average of individual F1 scores from the testing fractions. The top-performing method (highest F1 score) is highlighted in bold.