Table 2.
Author | Study design | SR indication | N / Dose | IGRT | Reported results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ahmed et al. 55 | Prospective case series | SM: primary and reirradiation | 66 patients(85 lesions)24 Gy (SF and HF) | BodyFix or thoracic-T double vacuum system*ExacTrac X-ray system with a 6D robotic couch# | mOS (12 months): 52.2%LC (1 year): 91.2%No grade 4 toxicity |
Amdur et al. 56 | Prospective case series | SM: primary and reirradiation | 21 patients(12 reirradiation)Dose: 15 Gy | Customizedbody mold / onboard cone-beam CT | OS (12 months): 60%43% pain reliefNo grade 3 or 4 toxicity |
Garg et al. 57 | Prospective case series | SM: primary SR | 61 patients(63 tumors)16-24Gy (SF) | BodyFix / stereotactic localizer and target frame | LC (18 months): 88%?Supports SR as first-line treatment |
Klish et al. 58 | Prospective case series | SM: reirradiation | 58 patientsDose: variable | BodyFix / stereotactic localizer and target frame | LC (12 months): 89.3%< 5% of isolated failures of the nonirradiated adjacent vertebral body = focal SR feasible |
Garg et al. 45 | Prospective case series | SM: reirradiation | 59 patients(63 tumors)30 Gy (5 fractions)27 Gy (3 fractions) | BodyFix stereotactic body frame system / stereotactic localizer and target frame | OS (12 months): 76%LC (12 months): 100%Freedom from neurological injury: 92% |
Gerszten et al. 22 | Prospective nonrandomized cohort study | SM: primary and reirradiation | 500 patients12.5 - 25 Gy (SF and HF) | CyberKnife: Aquaplast facemask$ | LC: 90% of primary lesions and 88% of lesions treated for radiographic tumor progressionClinical improvement (previous neurologic deficit): 84%Long-term pain improvement: 86% |
Haley et al. 59 | Prospective case series | Efficacy and cost effectiveness of CRT versus SR | 44 patients(22 CRT and 22 SR)Dose: variable | CyberKnife system | Similar pain reliefNo late complications in either groupCRT: more acute toxicities and was more likely to require additional interventions |
Folkert et al. 32 | Retrospective case series | SM: primary and reirradiation (sarcoma) | 120 lesions(SF and HF 24 Gy) | Noninvasive customized cradle / onboard imaging (orthogonal KV imaging and cone-beam CT) | OS 60%LC (12 months) 87.9%Low toxicity reported |
Zelefsky et al. 60 | Retrospective case series | SM: primary and reirradiation (renal cell) | 105 lesions(SF and HF)Dose: 24 Gy | Customized cradle / digitally reconstructed radiographs from the simulation studies for each field's beam's eye view | PFS (36 months - HF): 17%PFS (36 months -SF 24 Gy): 88%SF: improve local control |
Legend: N: number of patients; IGRT: image-guided radiotherapy; SF: single fraction; HF: hypofractionated; SM: spine metastasis; Hypo: hypofractionated; LC: local control; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; SR: spine radiosurgery; CRT: conventional radiotherapy; CT: computed tomography.
<?ENTCHAR ast?>: (Medical Intelligence, Schwabmunchen, Germany);
#(Brainlab, Feldkirchen, Germany);
%(Integra- Radionics Burlington, MA);
$(Aquaplast Corp., Wyckoff, NJ).