Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2015 Dec 2;191:237–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.052

Table 2. Moderator analyses.

Parameter k (n) d 95% CI I2 (%) p-value
Depression measurement technique < 0.0001
Interview-based 18 (19,988) -0.337 -0.485 to -0.188 34 < 0.0001
Self-report 20 (14,359) -0.078 -0.217 to 0.008 40 0.076
Telomere measurement technique < 0.0001
Other method than qPCR 7 (1,420) -0.717 -1.14 to -0.294 0 0.001
qPCR 31 (32,927) -0.111 -0.175 to -0.046 35 0.001
Source tissue <0.0001
Leukocytes 33 (22,465) -0.210 -0.297 to -0.120 44 < 0.0001
Other 5 (11,882) -0.181 -0.428 to 0.065 20 0.15
Chronic comorbid medical condition <0.0001
Condition 8 (2,086) -0.252 -0.455 to -0.050 27 0.015
Other 30 (32,261) -0.197 -0.290 to -0.123 45 < 0.0001
Age 37 (22,677) B = 0.005 -0.0002 to 0.011 80 0.06
Gender 37 (34,323) B = 0.176 -0.141 to 0.493 82 0.28
Smokers in study (%) 19 (12,838) B = -0.073 -0.969 to 0.823 69 0.87

The effects of all categorical variables were determined using the continuous random effects model in subgroup analyses. The effects of age and percent male gender, which were imputed as a continuous variable, were analyzed using the method of moments random-effects meta-regression model, resulting in a meta-regression coefficient (B). Highlighted p-values represent significant moderator effects on the relationship between depression and telomere length. MDD = major depressive disorder; k = number of studies within subgroup; n = number of subjects represented from all studies k; d = effect size reported as Cohen's d for subgroup; CI = confidence interval; I2 = test of heterogeneity within the subgroup, with 0% no observed heterogeneity, 25% low, 50% moderate and 75% high heterogeneity.