Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2006 Jul 12;32(3):543–561. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.05.021

Table 2.

Gender results of the saliva nicotine levels and startle eyeblink response analyses.

Analysis Df F p
Nicotine Results
   Gender x Deprivation Status x Nasal Spray 1,93 2.37 <.13
   Gender x Deprivation Status 1,108 0.09 <.76
   Gender x Nasal Spray 1,108 6.02 <.02
   Deprivation Status x Nasal Spray 1,94 98.84 <.0001
   Gender 1,112 2.45 <.13
   Deprivation Status 1,109 542.55 <.0001
   Nasal Spray 1,109 44.36 <.0001
Startle Results
   Gender x Deprivation Status x Nasal Spray x Slide Valence 3,318 0.67 <.58
   Gender x Deprivation Status x Nasal Spray 1,106 13.25 <.0005
   Gender x Deprivation Status x Slide Valence 3,336 0.34 <.80
   Gender x Nasal Spray x Slide Valence 3,339 0.97 <.41
     Gender x Deprivation Status 1,112 4.34 <.04
     Gender x Nasal Spray 1,113 9.78 <.003
   Gender x Slide Valence
   Gender 1,113 4.96 <.03