Table S2.
Name | |||||||
A75G | 6.3 | 4.7 | 0.28 | 1.35 | 2.2 | 0.54 | |
C47A | 21.4 | 2.9 | 0.21 | 1.38 | 16.3 | 0.29 | |
F21L | 14.8 | 0.005 | 0.41 | 2.40 | 6.6 | 0.58 | |
G32A | 6.0 | 0.3 | 0.38 | 1.91 | 2.3 | 0.63 | |
I23A | 3.2 | 4.3 | 0.26 | 1.36 | 0.8 | 0.64 | |
I49V | 14.4 | 26.1 | 0.44 | 1.31 | 9.4 | 0.57 | |
L36A | 44.4 | 6.0 | 0.33 | 1.60 | 25.0 | 0.49 | |
L58A | 9.6 | 4.3 | 0.28 | 1.35 | 4.9 | 0.45 | |
L60A | 43.8 | 4.1 | 0.29 | 1.58 | 26.0 | 0.43 | |
L8A | 23.2 | 235.2 | 0.44 | 1.19 | 11.6 | 0.68 | |
V30A | 9.0 | 4.3 | 0.30 | 1.35 | 4.4 | 0.47 | |
V71A | 7.3 | 2.5 | 0.29 | 1.33 | 3.7 | 0.44 | |
WT | 5.8 | 0.6 | 0.25 | 1.36 | 4.6 | 0.31 | |
Units | mol/L−1 | mol/L−1 | mol/L−1 |
Two types of fits were made: exponential fits and double exponential fits . shows relative likelihood of the double-exponential model with respect to the single-exponential model, as assessed by Akaike information criterion.