. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jul 3;75(6):2493–2504. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25820

Table 1. Number of RF Time Samples (N_t), Number of VOP of the Model (N_VOP), Size of the Magnetization ROI, Number of Iterations of the Predictor-Corrector Strategy (N_P-C), Total Time Spent in the Pulse Design (T_PD), and Total Time Spent in the Worst-Case Calculations (T_WC).

	N_t	N_VOP	ROI size	N_P-C	T_PD [s]	T_WC [s]
3T 8Ch Body: MLS RF-shimming	135	1289	80×120	3	1,467	132
3T 8Ch Body: MLS Two-spoke	225	1289	80×120	3	2,199	199
3T 8Ch Body: LS spiral	398	1289	80×120	4	1,168	37,600
7T 8Ch Head: MLS RF-shimming	159	484	100×100	2	248	36
7T 8Ch Head: MLS Two-spoke	265	484	100×100	2	476	62
7T 8Ch Head: LS spiral	243	484	100×100	4	316	8,184

Table 1. Number of RF Time Samples (Nt), Number of VOP of the Model (NVOP), Size of the Magnetization ROI, Number of Iterations of the Predictor-Corrector Strategy (NP-C), Total Time Spent in the Pulse Design (TPD), and Total Time Spent in the Worst-Case Calculations (TWC).