Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2015 Aug 19;36(6):525–533. doi: 10.1007/s10974-015-9419-z

Table 1.

RMS deviations (Å) between crystal structures and tropomyosin models

PDB IDa Li et al. model
(2011)b
von der Ecken et al.
model (2014)c
1C1G 1.91 4.76
1IC2 1.15 1.39
1KQL 1.26 1.71
3U1A 0.89 1.46
3U59 1.51 1.92
2D3E 1.65 2.85
2B9C 1.31 1.56

Root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) for the Cα-backbone atoms between tropomyosin models and crystal structures, after alignment with the rmsd-plugin of the program VMD (Humphrey et al. 1996)

a

The splayed or non-coiled-coil ends of the crystal structures were truncated prior to RMSD calculation, the employed residues are: 1C1G, Whitby-Phillips model (2000), residues 50–175 (same as segment shown in Fig. 2a). 1IC2, N-terminal 81 residues (striated muscle α-tropomyosin, Brown et al. (2001)). 1KQL, C-terminal 31 residues (rat striated muscle α-tropomyosin, Li et al. (2002)). 3U1A, N-terminal 81 residues (chicken gizzard smooth muscle α-tropomyosin, Rao et al. (2012)). 3U59, N-terminal 98 residues (chicken gizzard smooth muscle α-tropomyosin, Rao et al. (2012)). 2D3E, 134 C-terminal residues (rabbit striated muscle α-tropomyosin, Nitanai et al. (2007)). 2B9C, residues 98–175 (rat striated muscle α-tropomyosin, Brown et al. (2005))

b

Li et al. (2011) model, shown in Fig. 1a, 2b and 3a

c

von der Ecken et al. (2014) model, shown in Fig. 1b and 2c