Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 19;11(2):e0149622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149622

Table 2. Mean and standard deviation NAA/tCr and % Gray Matter (GM) data for the left/right pons (L1 –L6; R1 –R6) and cerebellum (C1 –C4) voxels selected from the CSI matrix for analysis.

Significant changes are underlined for the NAA/tCr ratio between controls and marked with ‘☆’ for low fatigue or ‘★’ for high fatigue voxels (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for NAA/tCr, or for %GM, in voxels in the pons (white) or in the cerebellum (light gray).

Controls Low Fatigue High Fatigue
% GM % GM % GM
R6 R5 L5 L6 R6 R5 L5 L6 R6 R5 L5 L6
12.3 ± 5.7 14.3 ± 6.6 13.1 ± 6.8 12.4 ± 4.9 11.2 ± 10.4 16.2 ± 10.7 16.7 ± 10.3 16.0 ± 13.0 11.0 ± 5.4 11.3 ± 4.1 11.8 ± 4.6 12.3 ± 5.1
R4 R3 L3 L4 R4 R3 L3 L4 R4 R3 L3 L4
31.3 ± 7.8 34.9 ± 7.0 34.3 ± 9.1 36.5 ± 10.3 35.2 ± 9.4 34.8 ± 13.3 31.7 ± 12.0 39.5 ± 12.2 29.3 ± 8.4 32.5 ± 6.3 30.9 ± 9.7 28.8 ± 6.0
R2 R1 L1 L2 R2 R1 L1 L2 R2 R1 L1 L2
62.6 ± 8.9 63.6 ± 9.1 60.3 ± 8.7 67.2 ± 11.2 62.3 ± 14.5 62.6 ± 11.8 60.0 ± 10.1 63.5 ± 11.3 59.9 ± 8.1 60.1 ± 6.2 57.3 ± 8.8 65.8 ± 6.9
C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4
90.0 ± 8.3 94.3 ± 4.0 93.9 ± 5.2 90.7 ± 7.8 92.2 ± 4.4 94.7 ± 4.6 94.1 ± 4.6 89.6 ± 7.4 81.9 ± 14.5 89.8 ± 7.7 87.9 ± 8.8 83.3 ± 11.9
NAA / tCr NAA / tCr NAA / tCr
R6 R5 L5 L6 R6 R5 L5 L6 R6 R5 L5 L6
2.55 ± 0.50 2.84 ± 0.56 2.69 ± 0.53 2.52 ± 0.54 2.53 ± 0.51 2.71 ± 0.32 2.50 ± 0.55 1.91 ± 0.34 2.12 ± 0.29 2.32 ± 0.49 2.36 ± 0.50 2.32 ± 0.47
R4 R3 L3 L4 R4 R3 L3 L4 R4 R3 L3 L4
2.09 ± 0.40 2.39 ± 0.51 2.38 ± 0.45 2.11 ± 0.47 2.01 ± 0.26 2.22 ± 0.32 2.07 ± 0.46 1.72 ± 0.44 1.82 ± 0.31 2.14 ± 0.50 2.35 ± 0.38 1.91 ± 0.29
R2 R1 L1 L2 R2 R1 L1 L2 R2 R1 L1 L2
1.48 ± 0.24 1.72 ± 0.33 1.72 ± 0.33 1.43 ± 0.23 1.40 ± 0.09 1.63 ± 0.26 1.66 ± 0.23 1.37 ± 0.20 1.44 ± 0.22 1.74 ± 0.26 1.80 ± 0.26 1.54 ± 0.19
C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4
1.20 ± 0.17 1.23 ± 0.17 1.20 ± 0.17 1.12 ± 0.16 1.29 ± 0.23 1.32 ± 0.26 1.29 ± 0.22 1.17 ± 0.19 1.19 ± 0.20 1.28 ± 0.27 1.24 ± 0.20 1.12 ± 0.17