Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 30;173(5):826–838. doi: 10.1111/bph.13384

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Of the six antagonists, only GIP(3–30)NH2 and GIP(5–30)NH2 are the competitive antagonists. GIP(1–42)‐mediated cAMP accumulation assayed for transiently transfected COS‐7 cells with the GIP receptor in the absence of and with increasing concentrations of either GIP(2–30)NH2, GIP(3–30)NH2, GIP(4–30)NH2, GIP(5–30)NH2, GIP(6–30)NH2 or GIP(7–30)NH2. The corresponding Schild plot is presented with a comparison with a linear regression with a slope of 1.0 and the X‐intercept of Ki for the antagonist. GIP(2–30)NH2 (A, n = 4), GIP(3–30)NH2 (B, n = 6), GIP(4–30)NH2 (C, n = 3), GIP(5–30)NH2 (D, n = 4), GIP(6–30)NH2 (E, n = 3) and GIP(7–30)NH2 (F, n = 4). Data shown are means ± SEM.