Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 20.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2015 Sep 15;539:515–525. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.129

Table A.I.

Summary of concentration–response (C–R) coefficients of mortality related to long-term exposure to PM2.5 and BC.

Reference Health endpoint
(mortality)
Location and study group C–R coefficient
per 1-µg/m3
BC/PM2.5
effect ratio
Coefficient of
the correlation
between PM2.5
and BC
PM2.5 BC
Janssen et al. (2011) All-cause Meta-analysis, including 4 studies: 2 in the US, 1 in
France and 1 in Netherlands2
0.007 0.058 8.4 N/A
Smith et al. (2010) All-cause 66 US cities, American Cancer Society cohort, age > 30 0.006 0.058 9.8 N/A
Cardiopulmonary 0.012 0.104 8.7
Lipfert et al. (2006) All-cause 70,000 male, US veterans cohort 0.006 0.166 27.7 0.54
Beelen et al. (2008) Natural-cause 120,852 adults aged 55–69; The Netherlands, 0.006 0.049 8.2 0.82
Respiratory 0.007 0.182 26.1
Cardiovascular 0.004 0.039 9.8
Filleul et al. (2005) Natural-cause 14,284 adults, age 25–59, France 0.010 0.058 5.9 0.87
Cardiopulmonary 0.012 0.049 4.1
Ostro et al. (2010) All-cause 133,479 female school teachers, California 0.077 0.486 6.3 0.84
Cardiopulmonary 0.091 0.523 5.8
Gan et al., (2011) Coronary heart disease 452,735 residents, 45–85 years of age in Vancouver, Canada 0.013 0.039 3 0.13
2

These four studies are also listed in this Table: Smith et al., 2010; Lipfert et al., 2006; Beelen et al., 2008; Filleul et al., 2005. The concentration–response coefficients of these four studies were converted from the Relative Risks listed in Table 2 in Janssen et al. (2012) rather than drawn directly from the original papers.