Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 20;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0743-7

Table 5.

Association between unit quality (QuIRC domain scores) and service users’ perceptions of care

Characteristic Odds ratioa or Coefficient estimatesb 95 % CI p
Autonomy (Resident Choice Scale)b
 Living environment 2.99 (1.73 to 4.24) <0.001
 Therapeutic environment 2.92 (1.54 to 4.30) <0.001
 Treatments and interventions 2.75 (1.67 to 3.82) <0.001
 Self-management and autonomy 2.62 (1.71 to 3.54) <0.001
 Human rights 2.34 (1.05 to 3.64) <0.001
 Recovery-based practice 2.20 (1.02 to 3.38) <0.001
 Social inclusion 2.15 (1.05 to 3.25) <0.001
Therapeutic milieu (General Milieu Index)b
 Living environment 0.77 (0.23 to 1.32) 0.006
 Therapeutic environment 0.77 (0.22 to 1.33) 0.006
 Treatments and interventions 0.49 (-0.003 to 0.98) 0.051
 Self-management and autonomy 0.54 (0.11 to 0.96) 0.014
 Human rights 0.73 (0.19 to 1.27) 0.008
 Recovery-based practice 0.55 (0.08 to 1.02) 0.021
 Social inclusion 0.45 (-0.02 to 0.93) 0.061
Experiences of care (Your Treatment and Care)a
 Living environment 1.44 (1.09 to 1.89) 0.009
 Therapeutic environment 1.37 (1.03 to 1.81) 0.030
 Treatments and interventions 1.29 (1.03 to 1.62) 0.027
 Self-management and autonomy 1.28 (1.04 to 1.58) 0.020
 Human rights 1.34 (1.02 to 1.76) 0.036
 Recovery-based practice 1.27 (1.00 to 1.62) 0.053
 Social inclusion 1.28 (1.02 to 1.59) 0.032
Quality of Life (MANSA)b
 Living environment 0.11 (-0.01 to 0.22) 0.076
 Therapeutic environment 0.12 (0.01 to 0.24) 0.039
 Treatments and interventions 0.06 (-0.04 to 0.16) 0.247
 Self-management and autonomy 0.05 (-0.04 to 0.15) 0.259
 Human rights 0.10 (-0.01 to 0.22) 0.079
 Recovery-based practice 0.05 (-0.05 to 0.15) 0.344
 Social inclusion 0.03 (-0.07 to 0.13) 0.610

MANSA Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life

aOdds ratio compares Your Treatment and Care scores below and above the median

bFor a 10 % point change in QuIRC domain scores