Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Hum Genet. 2016 Feb 1;80(2):136–143. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12147

Table 1.

Estimated power (%) at significance level 2.5 × 10−6 for the set of eighteen common G6PC2 variants: listed within parenthesis are the standard errors (%) of the estimated average powers over 1000 simulations for Davies, Lee and WP methods, and 108 simulations for the Monte Carlo (MC) approach. The Davies1, Lee1, and WP1 are the approximate powers computed at the expected genotype covariance matrix.

n MC Davies Davies1 WP WP1 Lee Lee1
1000 1.09 (0.001) 1.09 (0.02) 1.00 1.07 (0.02) 0.99 1.49 (0.02) 1.40
2000 15.8 (0.004) 15.8 (0.11) 15.5 15.6 (0.11) 15.3 19.0 (0.12) 18.9
3000 51.2 (0.005) 51.1 (0.16) 51.2 50.8 (0.16) 50.8 56.3 (0.16) 56.4
4000 82.0 (0.004) 82.0 (0.10) 82.3 81.8 (0.10) 82.0 85.3 (0.09) 85.5
5000 95.6 (0.002) 95.7 (0.03) 95.8 95.6 (0.04) 95.7 96.8 (0.03) 96.8
6000 99.2 (0.001) 99.3 (0.01) 99.3 99.2 (0.01) 99.3 99.5 (0.01) 99.5