Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Hum Genet. 2016 Feb 1;80(2):136–143. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12147

Table 2.

Estimated power (%) at significance level 2.5 × 10−6 for the set of nine rare G6PC2 variants: listed within parenthesis are the standard errors (%) of the estimated average powers over 1000 simulations for Davies, Lee and WP methods, and 108 simulations for the Monte Carlo (MC) approach. The Davies1, Lee1, and WP1 are the approximate powers computed at the expected genotype covariance matrix.

n MC Davies Davies1 WP WP1 Lee Lee1
4000 6.70 (0.003) 6.58 (0.12) 5.44 6.49 (0.11) 5.35 8.20 (0.13) 7.11
6000 25.7 (0.004) 25.4 (0.27) 23.8 25.2 (0.27) 23.5 29.6 (0.28) 28.3
8000 53.2 (0.005) 52.9 (0.35) 52.4 52.6 (0.35) 52.0 58.1 (0.34) 58.0
10000 77.1 (0.004) 77.1 (0.26) 77.4 76.8 (0.26) 77.1 81.0 (0.23) 81.5
12000 91.1 (0.003) 91.1 (0.14) 91.7 90.9 (0.15) 91.6 93.1 (0.12) 93.7
15000 98.5 (0.001) 98.5 (0.03) 98.8 98.5 (0.04) 98.8 99.0 (0.03) 99.2