Table 10.
Network integration and segregation measures differences in the case–case comparisons for all subjects under study. Arrows indicate the sense of the difference (↓ indicates decreased). The p-value of the comparison is shown in parentheses. Statistical significance was declared at level 0.05 and the resulting p-values were FDR corrected.
| g_eff | trans | lambda | n_eff | n_str | CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUGR (vs EP) | n.s | n.s | n.s | n.s | ↓ (0.056) |
n.s |
| IUGR + EP (vs EP) | ↓ (0.032) |
↓ (0.007) |
n.s | ↓ (0.0043) |
↓ (0.01) |
↓ (0.014) |
| IUGR + EP (vs IUGR) | ↓ (0.046) |
n.s | n.s | n.s | ↓ (0.018) |
n.s |
g_eff: global efficiency; trans: transitivity; lambda: average shortest path length; n_eff: averaged nodal efficiency; n_str: averaged nodal strength; CI: clustering index. n.s: not significant.