Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 22;6:21527. doi: 10.1038/srep21527

Figure 4. Condition for the transition of droplet breakup location.

Figure 4

(a) Critical Inline graphic for breakup at injection nozzle as a function of Inline graphic. Solid line represents the condition of Inline graphic from Eq. (4) where Inline graphic, while dashed line denotes Inline graphic as an estimate under the assumption of Inline graphic with Inline graphic. For the same α, several values of Df are tested (see supplementary Fig. S2). Triangle represents breakup at injection nozzle, while circle denotes breakup at focusing orifice. Data are obtained with viscosity ratio Inline graphic. (b) Plot of Inline graphic as a function of viscosity ratio Inline graphic. The black solid curve is obtained from Eq. (7) based on the result of Guillot et al.42, while the red dashed curve is estimated from Tomotika46 (see “determining the most unstable mode of a viscous jet” in supplementary information). Experimental results show better agreement with solid-curve estimation. Since the dashed-curve is taken under the circumstance of unbounded quasi-static flow, while solid-curve considers device confinement and flow rates, the difference in the two estimates reveals the significance of channel confinement and flow rates in affecting confined droplet breakup.