Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 22;6:21527. doi: 10.1038/srep21527

Table 1. Eighteen cases tested with different device geometries.

Case Number Di (μm) Df (μm) L(μm) Case Number Di (μm) Df (μm) L(μm)
A 86 258 97–714 K 147 242 806
B 186 258 197–1100 L 147 242 267
C 203 258 119–1136 M 147 242 570
D 217 258 130–1284 N 147 242 150
E 186 150 126–1166 O 147 176 272
F 186 210 146–1094 P 73 242 270
G 186 353 155–1038 Q 208 242 265
H 265 155 1208–1654 L 147 197 409
I 305 155 163–1410        
J 305 258 192–1263        

Cases A–J, with various combinations of Di and Df, are conducted to investigate the condition for the location shift of droplet breakup from focusing orifice to injection nozzle. For each case from A to J, the orifice distance L is variable, starting from an initial value comparable to the diameter of injection nozzle Di, ending with the value when droplet breakup occurs at the injection nozzle. The range of L for each case from A to J can also be found in Fig. 3. Cases K–Q are used to characterize the influence of device geometry on tip-multi-breaking mode. Different combinations of Di, Df and L are studied. Case L is used to develop the correlation between the oscillation period T and the capillary number Cafocus in tip-multi-breaking mode. The capillary number Cafocus ranges from 0.15 to 0.45 in our experiments.