Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Stroke. 2016 Feb;11(2):180–190. doi: 10.1177/1747493015616634

Table 1.

CT versus MRI selection across clinical scenarios and time windows

Clinical scenario #1: Patient is 65 years old Altered level of consciousness, aphasia, dense right hemiplegia with sensory deficit NIHSS of 21 Clinical scenario #2: Patient is 65 years old Altered level of consciousness, aphasia, dense right hemiplegia with sensory deficit NIHSS of 21 with early improvement to 5 Clinical scenario #3: Patient is 65 years old Facial weakness, mild limb weakness NIHSS of 5 Clinical scenario #4: Patient is 65 years old Facial weakness, hemiparesis NIHSS of 10



CT MRI CT and MRI CT MRI CT and MRI CT MRI CT and MRI CT MRI CT and MRI
0–3 h 71% (575) 8% (65) 21% (167) 67% (170) 10% (24) 23% (58) 65% (357) 9% (52) 26% (141) 68% (166) 9% (21) 23% (55)
6 h 55% (387) 19% (136) 26% (184) 55% (129) 19% (45) 25% (59) 51% (197) 24% (92) 25% (99) 54% (125) 19% (45) 27% (61)
6-h post ET 53% (173) 21 % (68) 26% (87) 50% (53) 25% (26) 25% (27) 45% (87) 26% (51) 29% (56) 49% (51) 25% (26) 26% (29)
10 h 58% (133) 18% (42) 24% (56) Scenario not surveyed at this time window 58% (133) 20% (45) 22% (51) 55% (128) 19% (43) 26% (60)
Wake-up 43% (98) 27% (62) 30% (70) Scenario not surveyed at this time window 44% (100) 27% (63) 29% (66) 41% (93) 28% (63) 31% (70)

CT: Computed Tomography; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.