Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Stroke. 2016 Feb;11(2):180–190. doi: 10.1177/1747493015616634

Table 2.

Parenchymal, vascular, and perfusion imaging selection using either CT or MRI across clinical scenarios and time windows

Clinical scenario #1: Patient is 65 years old Altered level of consciousness, aphasia, dense right hemiplegia with sensory deficit NIHSS of 21 Clinical scenario #2: Patient is 65 years old Altered level of consciousness, aphasia, dense right hemiplegia with sensory deficit NIHSS of 21 with early improvement to 5 Clinical scenario #3: Patient is 65 years old Facial weakness, mild limb weakness NIHSS of 5 Clinical scenario #4: Patient is 65 years old Facial weakness, hemiparesis NIHSS of 10




Parenchymal Vascular Perfusion Parenchymal Vascular Perfusion Parenchymal Vascular Perfusion Parenchymal Vascular Perfusion
0–3 h 25% (203) 37% (299) 38% (305) 21% (53) 37% (92) 42% (107) 19% (102) 38% (210) 43% (238) 28% (68) 32% (77) 40% (97)
6 h 19% (138) 23% (160) 56% (394) 18% (43) 28% (64) 54% (126) 19% (74) 28% (110) 53% (238) 19% (44) 27% (62) 54% (126)
6-h post ET 12% (38) 25% (83) 63% (207) 11% (12) 22% (23) 67% (71) 10% (19) 26% (50) 64% (125) 8% (9) 25% (26) 67% (71)
10 h 37% (85) 24% (55) 39% (91) Scenario not surveyed at this time window 38% (88) 28% (63) 34% (78) 32% (73) 29% (68) 39% (89)
Wake-up 15.5% (36) 25.5% (59) 59% (135) Scenario not surveyed at this time window 27% (62) 24% (55) 49% (112) 18% (42) 24% (54) 58% (131)

CT: Computed Tomography; ET: Endovascular Trial; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.