Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 22.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Stroke. 2016 Feb;11(2):180–190. doi: 10.1177/1747493015616634

Table 4.

Treatment decisions across clinical scenarios #2–4 and time windows

Clinical scenario #2:
M1 occlusion, small infarct,
small penumbra
Clinical scenario 3:
M1 occlusion, small infarct,
small penumbra
Clinical scenario #3:
M2 occlusion, small
infarct, small penumbra
Clinical scenario #3:
No occlusion,
small infarct,
normal perfusion
Clinical scenario #4:
Basilar occlusion

None IV
only
Endo
only
IV plus
possible
endo
(combo)
No
response
None IV
only
Endo
only
IV plus
possible
endo
(combo)
No
response
None IV only Endo
only
IV plus
possible
endo
(combo)
No
response
None IV
only
Endo
only
IV plus
possible
endo
(combo)
No
response
None IV
only
Endo
only
IV plus
possible
endo
(combo)
No
response
0–3 h 6% (16) 38% (106) 2% (6) 44% (124) 11% (30) 4% (11) 54% (151) 1% (4) 29% (81) 12% (35) 1% (2) 42% (118) 1% (2) 11% (30) 46% (130) 14% (39) 38% (108) <1% (1) 1% (2) 47% (132) <1% (1) 22% (62) 7% (20) 56% (157) 15% (42)
6 h 41% (115) 7% (20) 24% (68) 10% (28) 18% (51) 51% (143) 6% (18) 17% (48) 8% (22) 18% (51) 37% (104) 12% (33) 6% (16) 2% (5) 44% (124) Scenario not surveyed at this time window 18% (51) 1% (3) 39% (109) 24% (69) 18% (50)
6-h post ET 31% (37) 3% (3) 39% (46) 17% (20) 11% (13) 45% (53) 3% (4) 27% (32) 14% (17) 11% (13) 38% (46) 11% (13) 17% (20) 8% (9) 26% (31) Scenario not surveyed at this time window 13% (15) 2% (2) 45% (54) 28% (34) 12% (14)
10 h Scenario not surveyed at this time window 71% (199) 2% (7) 7% (19) 2% (5) 18% (52) Scenario not surveyed at this time window Scenario not surveyed at this time window 35% (98) 1% (2) 36% (101) 10% (29) 18% (52)
Wake-up Scenario not surveyed at this time window 46% (130) 11% (32) 10% (29) 11% (32) 21% (59) Scenario not surveyed at this time window Scenario not surveyed at this time window 19% (53) 4% (10) 36% (101) 22% (62) 20% (56)