Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 15;3(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000363

Table 2.

Linear regression analysis for the % difference in early diastolic velocity (e′) per 5 unit rise in HADS-scores

Model 1
Model 3
N Β=% difference per 5 HADS units (95% CI) N Β=% difference per 5 HADS units (95% CI)
HADS-D 996 −2.5 (−6.1 to 0.1) 844 −1.9 (−7.5 to 3.6)
HADS-DP 675 −7.4 (−8.8 to −0.8) 566 −4.8 (−8.8 to −0.8)
HADS-DR 675 −10.3 (−15.8 to −4.9) 566 −8.3 (−13.9 to −2.7)
HADS-A 995 −1.6 (−4.7 to 1.6) 844 −1.9 (−5.1 to 1.28)
HADS-AP 652 −0.2 (−3.9 to 3.4) 564 −2.0 (−3.9 to 3.4)
HADS-AR 652 −1.7 (−6.8 to 2.5) 547 −1.4 (−6.5 to 3.8)

Model 1: Age, sex, resting heart rate. Model 2: Model 1 + Marital status and education (data not shown). Model 3: Model 2 + systolic blood pressure, body mass index, smoking, physical activity index.

HADS-D, HADS-depression report from HUNT3; HADS-DP, Previous HADS-D report from HUNT2; HADS-DR, Repeated HADS-D reports (average sum score of two reports of HADS-D from HUNT2 + HUNT3); HADS-A, HADS-anxiety reports from HUNT3; HADS-AP, Previous HADS-A report from HUNT2; HADS-AR, Repeated HADS-A reports (average sum score of two reports of HADS-A from HUNT2 + HUNT3).