Table 1.
Bududa district (n 555) | Kiryandongo district (n 523) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Affected (n 285) | Controls (n 270) | Affected (n 260) | Controls (n 263) | |||||||||||
n | Mean | sd | n | Mean | sd | P | n | Mean | sd | n | Mean | sd | P | |
(a) The interviewed head of the household | ||||||||||||||
Male | 189 | 184 | 0·65 | 125 | 148 | 0·07 | ||||||||
Female | 96 | 86 | 135 | 115 | ||||||||||
Age (years) | 555 | 38·9 | 17·0 | 43·6 | 16·0 | <0·01 | 518* | 40·0 | 11·9 | 37·6 | 14·0 | 0·04 | ||
No education | 50 | 78 | <0·01 | 26 | 55 | <0·01 | ||||||||
Primary education | 213 | 140 | 193 | 178 | ||||||||||
Secondary education | 19 | 46 | 39 | 25 | ||||||||||
≥College | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||
(b) Household | ||||||||||||||
Number of members | 5·0 | 3·2 | 6·4 | 3·0 | <0·01 | 6·4 | 2·7 | 6·1 | 2·8 | 0·14 | ||||
Main source of livelihood | ||||||||||||||
Farming | 271 | 229 | <0·01 | 225 | 223 | 0·29 | ||||||||
Wage | 1 | 10 | 6 | 13 | ||||||||||
Trader | 6 | 22 | 26 | 19 | ||||||||||
Others | 7 | 9 | 3 | 8 | ||||||||||
Existence of assets that complement food source (commercial farmland, buildings, machines, motor vehicle, motorcycle, bicycle, livestock or poultry) | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 93 | 17 | <0·01 | 143 | 84 | <0·01 | ||||||||
No | 192 | 253 | 117 | 179 | ||||||||||
Received relief food in the last 3 years preceding the interview | ||||||||||||||
Yes | 65 | 27 | <0·01 | 242 | 4 | <0·01 | ||||||||
No | 220 | 243 | 18 | 259 | ||||||||||
Food insecurity scores | 9·1 | 6·0 | 12·4 | 6·0 | <0·01 | 9·2 | 8·3 | 5·7 | 5·4 | <0·01 | ||||
Diet diversity scores | 7·1 | 1·9 | 5·9 | 2·3 | <0·01 | 6·7 | 2·6 | 6·1 | 2·3 | 0·01 |
There are five missing values for age in the district, four in the controls and one in the affected group.