Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 28;115(4):718–729. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004961

Table 1.

Characteristics of households in each district (Numbers; mean values and standard deviations)

Bududa district (n 555) Kiryandongo district (n 523)
Affected (n 285) Controls (n 270) Affected (n 260) Controls (n 263)
n Mean sd n Mean sd P n Mean sd n Mean sd P
(a) The interviewed head of the household
Male 189 184 0·65 125 148 0·07
Female 96 86 135 115
Age (years) 555 38·9 17·0 43·6 16·0 <0·01 518* 40·0 11·9 37·6 14·0 0·04
No education 50 78 <0·01 26 55 <0·01
Primary education 213 140 193 178
Secondary education 19 46 39 25
≥College 3 6 2 5
(b) Household
Number of members 5·0 3·2 6·4 3·0 <0·01 6·4 2·7 6·1 2·8 0·14
Main source of livelihood
Farming 271 229 <0·01 225 223 0·29
Wage 1 10 6 13
Trader 6 22 26 19
Others 7 9 3 8
Existence of assets that complement food source (commercial farmland, buildings, machines, motor vehicle, motorcycle, bicycle, livestock or poultry)
Yes 93 17 <0·01 143 84 <0·01
No 192 253 117 179
Received relief food in the last 3 years preceding the interview
Yes 65 27 <0·01 242 4 <0·01
No 220 243 18 259
Food insecurity scores 9·1 6·0 12·4 6·0 <0·01 9·2 8·3 5·7 5·4 <0·01
Diet diversity scores 7·1 1·9 5·9 2·3 <0·01 6·7 2·6 6·1 2·3 0·01
*

There are five missing values for age in the district, four in the controls and one in the affected group.