Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 16;10:183–193. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S53653

Table S1.

The quality assessment of the included studies

Item (item number) Briesacher et al26 Eakin et al27 Geller et al20 Harrsion et al23 McNamara et al28 Modi et al24 Oermann et al25 Ramsey et al22 Regnault et al21 Wertz et al29
Title and abstract
 (la)
 (lb)
Introduction
 Background/rationale (2)
 Objectives (3) ?
Methods
 Study design (4)
 Setting (5)
 Participants (6a)
 Participants (6b) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
 Variables (7) ? ? ?
 Data sources/measurement (8) ? ? ?
 Bias (9) ? ?
 Study size (10)
 Quantitative variables (11)
 Statistical methods (12a)
 Statistical methods (12b)
 Statistical methods (12c)
 Statistical methods (12d)
 Statistical methods (12e) ?
Results
 Participants (13a)
 Participants (13b) ? ? ?
 Participants (13c)
 Descriptive data (14a) ?
 Descriptive data (14b) ? ? ?
 Descriptive data (14c)
 Outcome data (15)
 Main results (16a)
 Main results (16b) NA ?
 Main results (16c) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
 Other analyses (17) ? ?
Discussion
 Key results (18)
 Limitations (19) ? ?
 Interpretation (20) ?
 Generalizability (21) ? ? ? ? ? ?
Other information
 Funding (22) ?
The proportion of adequately reported items (“✓” responses) of all applicable item (%) 63% 70% 70% 70% 52% 67% 67% 70% 73% 73%

Notes: , yes; –, no; ?, partially.

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.