Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;6:21882. doi: 10.1038/srep21882

Table 2. Percentage kill within plaque biofilms deposited on acrylic disks in vivo.

Parameter Control side* (n = 32 subjects) Experimental side* (n = 3 subjects) P value 95% CI for difference of means
Biovolume 3.74 ± 2.11 33.94 ± 23.88 ≤0.001 21.74–38.68
Biomass** 0 μm 7.45 ± 3.54 29.40 ± 11.01 ≤0.001 17.86–26.04
1 μm 6.84 ± 3.17 28.54 ± 10.83 ≤0.001 17.71–25.69
2 μm 6.41 ± 2.93 27.47 ± 10.57 ≤0.001 17.19–24.94
3 μm 5.95 ± 2.78 26.52 ± 10.50 ≤0.001 16.74–24.41
4 μm 5.46 ± 2.78 25.63 ± 10.44 ≤0.001 16.37–23.98
5 μm 5.05 ± 2.40 24.38 ± 9.66 ≤0.001 15.82–22.85
6 μm 4.93 ± 2.35 23.11 ± 9.01 ≤0.001 14.89–21.47
7 μm 4.91 ± 2.63 21.91 ± 8.69 ≤0.001 13.79–20.21
8 μm 4.32 ± 2.60 19.98 ± 7.89 ≤0.001 12.72–18.59
9 μm 4.42 ±3.06 19.63 ± 7.43 ≤0.001 12.28–18.14
10 μm 4.30 ± 3.23 18.78 ±7.79 ≤0.001 11.35–17.61
11 μm 4.51 ± 2.66 18.94 ± 9.39 ≤0.001 10.57–18.18

*Values are means ± standard deviations (in percentages).

**Numbers represent distance from the bottom of biofilms. Because biofilms have different thickness, only slice levels that were present in all biofilms derived from the control side and the experiment side were statistically analysed.

Dunn–Šidák correction was used to control the family-wise error rate for testing 12 hypotheses (i.e. 12 slices within the Z-stacks) using the same biofilm specimens. Accordingly, only a P value < 0.00427 was considered significantly different between the control side and the experimental side.

Confidence interval.