Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 11;64(3):209–212. doi: 10.7727/wimjopen.2014.273

Table. Overall performance of agreement, differences and accuracy between eGFR and sGFR.

CG equation MDRD equation Ruijin equation
Correlation coefficient 0.70 0.70 0.72
Consistency limits -45.1~65.5 -39.6~72.8 -37.2~50.2
Slope between regression line and x-axis (95% CL) 0.42 (0.32, 0.51) 0.44 (0.34, 0.52) 0.15 (0.06, 0.24)
Intercept between regression line and y-axis (95% CL) -26.55 (-35.33, −17.76) -23.24 (-32.25, −14.23) 6.52 (-14.91, 1.87)
Deviation value (25%, 75%) 5.23 (-6.76, 26.15) 14.51 (-3.14, 34.09) 5.84 (-5.83, 20.72)
Deviation measured value% (25%, 75%) 21.87 (8.53, 38.42) 25.76 (10.90, 47.15) 17.42 (16.83, 32.29)
15% coincidence rate 0.377551 0.363946 0.44898
30% coincidence rate 0.64966 0.598639 0.710884
50% coincidence rate 0.823129 0.785714 0.901361

eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; sGFR: standard glomerular filtration rate;

CG: Cockcroft-Gault; MDRD: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease