Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Violence. 2014 Nov 3;5(3):305–313. doi: 10.1037/a0038316

Table 2.

Regression model estimates

OLS Square root Poisson Negative binomial ZI Poisson ZI Negative binomial

B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE B SE
Predicting increasing frequency of SA
Intercept 1.16*** .16 .38*** .04 −.38*** .05 −.68*** .14 1.54*** .06 .78* .31
HTW .01 .21 .05 .05 .10* .05 .13 .19 −.19** .06 −.07 .21
RMA .30 .21 .09 .05 .15** .05 .45* .20 .15* .05 .21 .22
Charm .05 .21 .05 .04 .21*** .05 .23 .17 −.08** .05 .04 .20
Peer .35 .18 .07 .04 −.05 .03 .25 .20 .14*** .04 .04 .19
Sanctions −.39* .17 −.09* .04 −.28*** .04 −.20 .15 −.19** .04 −.24 .15
Pornography .06 .18 .01 .04 .06 .04 .14 .16 .01 .04 .05 .14
Compulsion .43* .18 .11** .04 .28*** .03 .16 .16 .06 .04 −.01 .16
Impulsivity .44* .18 .08* .04 .33*** .04 .37* .16 .31*** .05 .56** .20
Often drunk .75*** .18 .18*** .04 .28*** .03 .48** .18 .05** .03 .07 .11
α a 9.40*** 1.25 2.52** .93

Predicting membership in the true-zero SA group
Intercept 1.85*** .13 .99* .40
HTW −.31* .15 −.31 .24
RMA −.25 .15 −.33 .24
Charm −.23 .14 −.26 .22
Peer −.06 .12 −.30 .29
Sanctions .19 .12 .15 .17
Pornography −.08 .12 −.09 .18
Compulsion −.16 .11 −.29 .25
Impulsivity −.08 .12 .29 .25

Often drunk −.39** .11 −.81** .29
    AIC 1830 --- 2824 1129 1484 1108

Note: OLS = Ordinary least squares; ZI = Zero-inflated; HTW = Hostility toward Women; RMA = Rape Myth Acceptance; SA = Sexual Aggression; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion.

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001 (all two-tailed).

a

Overdispersion parameter estimate.