Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2015 Jul 31;73:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.013

Table 1.

The association between group dynamics at session 2 and eating disorder symptomatology at 12 month follow-up

Predictors Estimate SE Test statistic p Estimate SE Test statistic p

EDE Global Score Frequency of Binge Eating
Predictor: GAS

Intercept 0.31 0.22 1.40 0.163 1.89 0.23 2221.46 0.001
Group 1 −0.33 0.15 −2.25 0.026 −0.35 0.17 3.37 0.034
Group 2 −0.16 0.14 −1.11 0.270 −0.08 0.13 0.36 0.547
Baseline 0.77 0.08 10.76 0.001 0.04 0.00 96.20 0.001
GAS −0.00 0.00 −0.81 0.420 −0.01 0.00 4.40 0.035

Predictor: GCQ-E
Intercept 0.26 0.22 1.18 0.240 1.81 0.13 201.23 0.001
Group 1 −0.31 0.14 −2.14 0.034 −0.35 0.17 3.07 0.044
Group 2 −0.20 0.15 −1.23 0.220 −0.08 0.14 0.32 0.569
Baseline 0.78 0.07 11.01 0.001 0.04 0.00 96.02 0.001
GCQ-E −0.20 0.07 −2.84 0.005 −0.11 0.08 2.16 0.142

Note: Models predicting global eating disorder psychopathology, as measured by the Eating Disorder Examination Global score and predicting frequency of objective binge eating in the past 28 days, as measured by the Eating Disorder Examination; Baseline refers to the baseline level of the outcome variable (EDE Global Score or Frequency of Binge Eating); GAS = Group Attitude Scale; GCQ-E – Group Climate Questionnaire – Short Form Engaged Subscale; Group 1 = Self-Help; Group 2 = Therapist Assisted; Group 3 = Therapist Led; GAS and GCQ-E were each centered.