Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug;58(4):1306–1318. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0311

Table 2.

Overall random effects weighted mean effect sizes for dialect and overall literacy, reading, and written language and moderator analyses.

N k Effect size
95% Confidence interval
Test of heterogeneity
r Lower Upper Q I2 (%)
All studies 2,007 20 −.28*** −.37 −.18 72.85*** 74
All studies excluding Sligh & Conners (2003) 1,947 19 −.33*** −.39 −.26 35.30** 49
Studies with reading outcomes 1,947 19 −.32*** −.41 −.24 40.92** 56
Studies with print and/or phonological awareness outcomes 1,947 19 −.33*** −.41 −.25 38.41** 53
Studies with oral language outcomes 1,637 12 −.33*** −.41 −.23 36.69*** 59
Studies with spelling and/or writing outcomes 429 8 −.22** −.32 −.11 8.79 20
Moderators
 SES
QModel
df
p value
  Overall literacy 1.38 1 .24
  Reading





1.83
1
.18
 Grade Level
N
k
Effect size
95% Confidence interval
QBetween
df
p value
r
Lower
Upper
  Overall literacy
   Primary (K–2) 1639 14 −.35*** −.41 −.27 0.73 1 .40
   Intermediate (3–6) 308 5 −.27*** −.41 −.13
  Reading
   Primary (K–2) 1,639 14 −.35*** −.42 −.28 1.86 1 .17
   Intermediate (3–6) 308 5 −.25** −.39 −.09

Note. k = number of studies.

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.