Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug;58(4):1326–1340. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0348

Table 3.

Specific language impairment (SLI) versus typically developing age-matched (TDA) regular past tense outcomes.

Study name Language Hedges's g 95% confidence interval
Upper limit Lower limit
1 Leonard et al. (1992) English −3.212 −4.514 −1.910
2 Leonard et al. (2003) English −2.694 −3.779 −1.609
3 Leonard et al. (2007) English −3.004 −4.123 −1.885
4 Marchman et al. (1999) English −0.519 −1.019 −0.019
5 Oetting & Horohov (1997) English −2.822 −3.981 −1.664
6 Redmond (2003) English −1.827 −3.019 −0.635
7 Redmond (2005) English −1.282 −2.159 −0.406
8 Rice & Wexler (1996) English −3.219 −3.874 −2.565
9 Rice et al. (2004) English −0.463 −0.715 −0.210
10 Windsor et al. (2000) English −0.659 −1.299 −0.019
English combined −1.898 −2.667 −1.129
11 Hansson & Leonard (2003) Swedish −1.864 −2.733 −0.994
12 Hansson et al. (2000) Swedish −1.059 −1.830 −0.288
13 Lum & Bleses (2012) Danish −2.810 −3.771 −1.849
14 Rispens & De Bree (2014) Dutch −1.977 −2.526 −1.428
15 Verhoeven et al. (2011) Dutch −1.076 −1.984 −0.169
Non-English Germanic combined −1.746 −2.322 −1.169
Overall combined −1.801 −2.262 −1.339