Table V.
Published outcomes of hip arthroscopy for subspine impingement (n, number of patients; HHS, Harris hip score; mHHS, modified Harris hip score; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale score; NAHS, Non-arthritic Hip Score; SF-12, Short Form-12 score)
Authors (year of publication) | Study design | Prevalence | n | Age (range) | Male gender | Sports involvement | Follow-up (months) | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Larson et al. [34] | Case series | N/A | 3 | 23 (21–31) | 33% | 100% | 16 (12–18) | HHS: 75.7 versus 93.7VAS: 6.2 versus 1.1 |
Matsuda and Calipusan [49] | Case report | N/A | 1 | 13 | Yes | Yes | 18 | NAHS: 22 versus 98 |
Hetsroni et al. [46] | Case series | 0.7% (10/1370) | 10 | 25 (15–44) | 100% | 100% | 14.7 (6–26) | mHHS: 64 versus 98 |
Amar et al. [36] | Case report | N/A | 1 | 20 | Yes | Yes | 6 weeks | Pain relief at 6 weeks |
Hapa et al. [35] | Case series | Not reported | 150 (163 hips) | 28 (14–52) | 50% | Not reported | 11.1 (6–24) | mHHS: 63.1 versus 85.3; SF-12: 70.4 versus 81.3; VAS: 4.9 versus 1.9 |
Outcome is reported as mean pre- versus post-operative functional and pain scores, when available.