Table 5.
Description of the models fitted on selfing rates in Noccaea caerulescens using the full information of the likelihood profiles, and result of model comparisons based on log likelihood tests
| Year | Mean(s) | s.d. | Log likelihood | Difference in deviance | d.f. | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | μMET-2012, μNONMET-2012 | σMET-2012, σNONMET-2012 | −4·90 | |||
| μMET-2012, μNONMET-2012 | σ2012 | −4·97 | 0·14 | 1 | 0·71 | |
| μ2012 | σ2012 | −7·31 | 4·68 | 1 | 0·03 | |
| 2013 | μMET-2013, μNONMET-2013 | σMET-2013, σNONMET-2013 | −2·86 | |||
| μMET-2013, μNONMET-2013 | σ2013 | −2·86 | 0·00 | 1 | 1 | |
| μ2013 | σ2013 | −8·70 | 11·67 | 1 | 0·001 |
MET, metallicolous; NONMET, non-metallicolous; μ, mean of the logit-normal distribution; σ, standard deviation of the logit-normal distribution of selfing rates among populations.
The best models are in bold.