Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;2015:560–569.

Table 1.

Comparison of conventional paper medical charts and MIVA 2.0.

TOPIC PAPER CHARTS MIVA 2.0



Importance to Clinical Work • Absolutely critical in the ICU.
• Have natural affordances that are difficult to replicate.
• Can be very helpful in the ICU.



Learnability • Require an initial investment in learning.
• Work routinely in the ICU environment with no learning needed.
• Is similar to other information displays and thus requires minimal learning.
• Is much easier than commercial EMR systems.



Limitations • Cannot view data efficiently or integrate different pieces of information very well.
• Require more mental effort: flipping pages with different data in different places.
• Are not computable.
• Lack of familiarity.
• May only be able to compare five visual data points simultaneously.
• Lack of the undo option.
• No emergency exit appears anywhere.



Long-term Consequence • Provide greater chances for errors.
• Give an inefficient interpretation of data leading to inaccurate conclusions.
• May expedite data interpretation / trend analysis.
• Provides user-controlled display with info access.
• Allows for faster decision-making.