Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Commun. 2015 Sep 18;21(1):125–133. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1039677

Table 2.

Quitline utilization and continuous cessation according to interpersonal communication about incentive-based program and incentive importance for quitline connections (n = 970)

Quitline utilization
Continuous cessationa
No utilization
Utilization
Not smoke free
Smoke free
Variable Total (n = 327) % Total (n = 643) % Total (n = 786) % Total (n = 184) %
Interpersonal communication
    Did not tell others (n = 481) 204 62.4 277 43.1 403 51.3 78 42.4
    Told others (n = 489) 123 37.6 366 56.9 383 48.7 106 57.6
Incentive importance
    Incentive not important (n = 304) 118 36.1 186 28.9 244 31.0 60 32.6
    Incentive important (n = 666) 209 63.9 457 71.1 542 69.0 124 67.4

Note. Each of the four bivariate relationships totals to 970 participants. Four separate chi-square values were obtained for each of the four bivariate associations: (a) utilization by interpersonal communication = 32.32, p < .001; (b) utilization by incentive importance = 5.16, p < .05; (c) continuous cessation by interpersonal communication = 4.70, p < .05; (d) continuous cessation by incentive importance = 0.17, p > .10. All associations were statistically significant except for continuous cessation by incentive importance.

a

30-day point prevalence abstinence after 7 months from the beginning of the intervention.