Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 7;6(1):72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2014.11.020

Table 2.

Results for overall PACIC-20 scale and subscales according to patient characteristics (n = 377).

Patient group Patient activation p Delivery system or practice design p Goal setting or tailoring p Follow-up or coordination p Problem solving or contextual p
Gender
 Men 4.1 (0.7) 0.167 3.5 (0.8) 0.200 3.6 (0.5) 1.000 3.6 (0.6) 0.136 2.8 (0.6) 1.000
 Women 4.2 (0.7) 3.6 (0.7) 3.6 (0.5) 3.5 (0.7) 2.8 (0.7)
Age groups (y)
 18–30 4.2 (0.8) 0.005 3.5 (0.8) 0.303 3.7 (0.6) 0.183 3.6 (0.7) 1.000 2.9 (0.7) 0.019
 31–45 4.2 (0.6) 3.6 (0.8) 3.6 (0.5) 3.6 (0.7) 2.8 (0.6)
 46–60 4.3 (0.7) 3.6 (0.7) 3.6 (0.5) 3.6 (0.6) 2.9 (0.7)
 > 60 3.9 (0.8) 3.4 (0.8) 3.5 (0.6) 3.6 (0.7) 2.6 (0.6)
Educational status
 < High school 4.2 (0.7) 0.041 3.5 (0.7) 0.003 3.6 (0.5) 0.080 3.6 (0.7) 0.682 2.7 (0.6) 0.101
 High school 4.2 (0.6) 3.8 (0.7) 3.6 (0.5) 3.6 (0.6) 2.8 (0.6)
 > High school 3.9 (0.9) 3.5 (1.1) 3.4 (0.7) 3.5 (0.7) 2.9 (0.7)
Monthly income
 ≤ 10,000 4.2 (0.6) < 0.0001 3.5 (0.7) 0.265 3.6 (0.5) 0.0003 3.7 (0.6) 0.0004 2.7 (0.6) 0.0004
 > 10,000 3.6 (0.9) 3.7 (1.2) 3.2 (0.7) 3.3 (0.7) 3.1 (0.7)
Chronic conditions
 Rheumatologic 4.2 (0.6) 0.348 3.6 (0.8) 0.445 3.5 (0.5) 0.434 3.6 (0.6) 0.715 2.8 (0.6) 0.707
 Gynecologic 4.2 (0.8) 3.7 (0.7) 3.6 (0.6) 3.6 (0.7) 2.8 (0.7)
 Allergic 4.0 (0.9) 3.5 (0.8) 3.5 (0.6) 3.5 (0.6) 2.7 (0.5)
Health status
 Poor to fair 4.1 (0.7) 0.006 3.4 (0.8) 0.001 3.5 (0.6) 0.063 3.6 (0.7) 0.339 2.7 (0.7) 0.004
 Good 4.3 (0.6) 3.7 (0.7) 3.6 (0.4) 3.7 (0.6) 2.8 (0.6)
 Very good–excellent 4.0 (0.8) 3.7 (0.9) 3.7 (0.7) 3.7 (0.7) 3.1 (0.7)

Data are presented as mean (SD).

ANOVA = analysis of variance; PACIC-20 = Patient-Assessed Chronic Illness Care; SD = standard deviation.

Independent t test.

one-way ANOVA.

p less than 0.05 (two-tailed) considered as statistically significant.