. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016 Jan-Mar;30(1):27–34. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000120

Table 3.

Results of the hierarchical regression used to predict DRS-2 decline

Step	F; df; p	R²	SEE	β, SE

1	0.05; 40; =0.824	0.24	13.7
DRS-2 Baseline				−0.07, 0.30
Constant				15.27, 38.83

2	32.9; 39; <0.001	0.62	8.4
DRS-2 Baseline				−0.18, 0.18
Trails A				−0.30, 0.04
Constant				28.06, 23.86

3	33.1; 38; <0.001	0.71	7.3
DRS-2 Baseline				−0.07, 0.16
Trails A				−0.23, 0.04
Cash Transactions				1.17, 0.32
Constant				12.87, 21.25

4	31.3; 37; <0.001	0.75	6.8
DRS-2 Baseline				0.03, 0.15
Trails A				−0.15, 0.05
Cash Transactions				1.01, 0.30
Checkbook Management				0.54, 0.19
Constant				−1.41, 20.22

Note. DRS-2 Baseline was entered in first block of hierarchical regression. R² = adjusted R². SEE = standard error of the estimate of the regression model, β = unstandardized beta weights, SE = standard error of coefficient, DRS = Dementia Rating Scale.