Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016 Jan-Mar;30(1):27–34. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000120

Table 5.

Results of the hierarchical regression used to predict change on CDR Sum of Boxes

Step F; df; p R2 SEE β, SE
1 0.49; 47; =0.486 0.01 1.77
CDR Baseline −0.22, 0.31
Constant −1.09, 0.57
2 6.09; 46; =0.005 0.18 1.60
CDR Baseline −0.23, 0.28
Animal Naming −0.20, 0.06
Constant −0.94, 0.52
3 9.64; 45; <0.001 0.35 1.42
CDR Baseline −0.12, 0.25
Animal Naming −0.21, 0.05
VR I −0.05, 0.01
Constant −0.91, 0.46
4 9.10; 44; <0.001 0.40 1.36
CDR Baseline −0.21, 0.25
Animal Naming −0.18, 0.05
VR I −0.05, 0.13
Cash Transactions −0.14, 0.06
Constant −0.75, 0.45

Note. CDR Sum of Boxes Baseline was entered in first block of hierarchical regression. R2 = adjusted R2. SEE = standard error of the estimate of the regression model, β = unstandardized beta weights, SE = standard error of coefficient, CDR = Clinical Dementia Rating, VR = Visual Reproduction.