Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Radiol. 2015 Dec;50(12):821–827. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000190

Table 5.

a: Higher parenchyma moments: Controls Baseline vs. Post-furosemide
Shape Baseline Post-Furosemide P-value d
μ1 23.8 ± 2.7 20.6 ± 4.1 0.008 0.84
μ2 88.7 ± 39 48.5 ± 15 0.001 1.04
μ3 1.26 ± 0.8 × 103 0.59 ± 0.3 × 103 0.007 0.83
μ4 53 ± 43 × 103 22 ± 14 × 103 0.007 0.72
b: Higher parenchyma moments: CKD Baseline vs. Post-furosemide
Shape Baseline Post-Furosemide P-value d
μ1 26.3 ± 6.1 24.8 ± 5.6 0.02 0.21
μ2 79.3 ± 26 73.6 ± 30 0.28 0.17
μ3 0.87 ± 0.53 × 103 0.89 ± 0.65 × 103 0.56 −0.02
μ4 36.5 ± 22 × 103 36.8 ± 30 × 103 0.88 −0.01

Wilcoxon signed rank test statistic

Cohen’s d measure of effect size