Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Transplant. 2013 Oct 26;27(6):953–960. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12271

Table 2.

Positive and negative cases of kidney dysfunction in each group

Urine Biomarker Normal (n=15) ATN (n=29) AR (n=41) Control (n=15)

κFLC (< 20 mg/L) Positive 0 (0%) 28 (97%) 39 (95%) 1 (7%)
Negative 15 (100%) 1 (3%) 2 (5%) 14 (93%)
λFLC (< 17 mg/L) Positive 0 (0%) 17 (59%) 25 (61%) 0 (0%)
Negative 15 (100%) 12 (41%) 16 (39%) 15 (100%)
(κ+λ) FLC (< 40 mg/L) Positive 0 (0%) 26 (90%) 36 (88%) 0 (0%)
Negative 15 (100%) 3 (10%) 5 (12%) 15 (100%)
MAB (< 40 mg/L) Positive 0 (0%) 15 (52%) 23 (56%) 5 (33%)
Negative 15 (100%) 14 (48%) 18 (44%) 10 (67%)
μ2-M (< 200 μg/L) Positive 0 (0%) 24 (83%) 34 (83%) 0 (0%)
Negative 15 (100%) 5 (17%) 7 (17%) 15 (100%)
RBP (< 0.56 mg/L) Positive 0 (0%) 25 (86%) 32 (78%) 1 (7%)
Negative 15 (100%) 4 (14%) 9 (22%) 14 (93%)
KIM-1 (< 2.15 μg/L) Positive 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 7 (17%) 2 (13%)
Negative 15 (100%) 28 (97%) 34 (83%) 13 (87%)
NGAL (< 5.3 μg/L) Positive 0 (0%) 16 (55%) 18 (44%) 10 (67%)
Negative 15 (100%) 13 (45%) 23 (56%) 5 (33%)

Data are expressed as number (percentage)

The highest urine concentration in Normal group is used as the upper “normal limit” for each biomarker (left column)