Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 9;4(1):49–54. doi: 10.1177/2050640615590303

Table 1.

Comparison between APC and control groups

APC (n = 24) Control (n = 28) Total (n = 52) P value
Gender (%) .061
 Male 13 (54.2) 22 (78.6) 35 (67.3)
 Female 11 (45.8) 6 (21.4) 17 (32.7)
Age (years ± SD) 57 ± 13 62 ± 11 60 ± 12 .159
Hemoglobin (g/dL ± SD) 7.3 ± 2.7 8.2 ± 2.3 7.8 ± 2.5 .177
Clinical presentation (%) .516
 Hematemesis 9 (37.5) 13 (46.4) 22 (42.3)
 Others 15 (62.5) 15 (53.6) 30 (57.7)
ECOG .376
 I (good PS) 18 (75) 17 (60.7) 35 (67.3)
 II (poor PS) 6 (25) 11 (39.3) 17 (32.7)
Bleeding site (%) .108
 Duodenum 7 (29.2) 3 (10.7) 10 (19.2)
 Esophagus 3 (12.5) 9 (32.1) 12 (23.1)
 Stomach 14 (58.3) 16 (57.1) 30 (57.7)
Active bleeding (%) 15 (62.5) 4 (14.3) 19 (36.5)  < .001
Additional treatment (%) 9 (37.5) 8 (28.6) 17 (32.7) .494
Re-bleeding (%) 8 (33.3) 4 (14.3) 12 (23.1) .104
Mortality (%) 5 (20.8) 12 (42.9) 17 (32.7) .091

APC: argon plasma coagulation; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (Group I: good performance status (ECOG 0–2); Group II: poor performance status (ECOG 3–4)); PS: performance status; SD: standard deviation.