Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar;137(3):e20152007. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2007

TABLE 3.

Reasons for EI Enrollment by Fertility Status: Massachusetts Singleton Births, July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2008

Distribution of Reasons for EI Enrollmenta,b
ART Subfertile Fertile Total P
Enrolled, n 1206 960 50 403 52 569
Established conditions, % 15.3 14.5 11.2 11.3 <.0001
 CNS disorder 1.7 1.9 1.5 1.5 .53
 Circulatory disorder 1.1 1.4 0.8 0.8 .052
 Congenital torticollis 5.5 3.7 2.7 2.8 <.0001
 Sensory disorder 2.0 1.8 1.3 1.3 .07
Established delays, % 85.3 86.7 83.5 83.6 <.01
 Cognition 22.7 16.9 21.7 21.6 <.01
 Adaptive 19.3 15.9 16.3 16.4 .02
 Fine motor 59.0 60.5 59.5 59.5 .75
 Gross motor 21.8 12.3 17.3 17.3 <.0001
 Expressive language 32.7 25.2 22.5 22.7 <.0001
 Receptive language 26.5 26.0 35.0 34.6 <.0001
 Social emotional 12.0 7.5 10.1 10.1 <.01
At-risk conditions, % 38.6 34.4 49.3 48.8 <.0001
 Birth weight <1200 g 3.5 1.9 2.0 2.0 <.01
 Gestational age <32 weeks 7.5 4.0 3.8 3.9 <.0001
 NICU admission >5 days 16.3 11.2 9.6 9.8 <.0001
 Hospital stay >25 days in 6 months 7.6 5.4 4.4 4.5 <.0001
 Diagnosis of IGUR or SGA 3.7 3.5 2.5 2.6 .01
 Small size (weight, age, height criteria) 8.5 8.9 4.8 5.0 <.0001
 Chronic feeding difficulties 11.1 10.5 8.7 8.8 <.01
 Suspected CNS abnormality 4.8 4.6 5.7 5.6 .17
 Parental chronic illness/disability 7.6 7.4 14.7 14.4 <.0001
Clinical judgement, % 5.0 4.3 4.0 4.0 .22

CNS, central nervous system; IGUR, intrauterine growth restriction; SGA, small for gestational age.

a

Percentages sum to >100 because children may be enrolled in EI program for >1 reason.

b

Not all reasons are presented; only risk factors occurring most frequently within each category are presented.