Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Learn Dev. 2015 Oct 15;12(1):14–41. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2015.1018420

Table 5.

A. Linear mixed effect model of (Elogit) Two-Participant overall looking Preferences in Animate-Animate Contexts. Effect Syntax (Baseline, Transitive, CI). 2-Yr-Olds.
Fixed Effects Estimate S.E. df t p-value significance
Intercept 0.450 0.19 8 2.33 0.049 *
Syntax (Baseline vs. Transitive) 0.051 0.18 4 0.28 0.797
Syntax (Baseline vs. CI) −0.193 0.23 0 −0.78 0.800
B. Linear mixed effect model of (Elogit) Two-Participant overall looking preferences in Animate-Inanimate Contexts. Effect Syntax (Baseline, Transitive, CI). 2-Yr-Olds.
Fixed Effects Estimate S.E. df t p-value significance
Intercept −0.080 0.18 8 −0.44 0.672
Syntax (Baseline vs. Transitive) 0.049 0.15 7 0.32 0.759
Syntax (Baseline vs. CI) −0.092 0.15 14 −0.60 0.558

Notes: CI = Conjoined Subject Intransitive; Random effects structure included intercept for Subjects plus intercept and effect of Syntax for Items. R-code used with lmerTest: Elogit ∼ Syntax + (1|Subject) + (1+Syntax|Item). Degrees of freedom (df) calculated using the Satterthwaite approximation.