Table 3. Logistic regression results with high satisfaction with care (median cut-off) as the dependent variable.

Independent variable	Diagnostic resolution			p value Wald Fa	Cancer treatment			p value Wald Fa
	Odds ratio	Lower 95 % confidence limit	Upper 95 % confidence limit		Odds ratio	Lower 95 % confidence limit	Upper 95 % confidence limit
Group allocation				0.5808				0.6059
Control	1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00	1.00
Patient navigation	1.07	0.85	1.34		0.9	0.65	1.29
Gender				0.0462				0.9709
Female	2.55	1.02	6.39		0.98	0.29	3.27
Male	1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00	1.00
Age categorized				0.0008				0.0714
<40	1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00	1.00
40–49	1.57	1.26	1.95		1.64	0.86	3.13
50–<60	1.45	1.10	1.91		1.79	0.63	5.07
60+	1.45	1.04	2.02		2.20	0.91	5.29
Race/ethnicity				<0.0001				0.0053
Black	0.85	0.62	1.15		0.64	0.49	0.84
White	1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00	1.00
Hispanic	0.56	0.44	0.72		0.59	0.23	1.51
Other	0.54	0.26	1.15		0.73	0.31	1.69
Median household income by ZIP				0.0037
Less than $30,000	0.84	0.62	1.16
$30,000 to 39,999	0.67	0.53	0.84
$40,000 to 49,999	0.68	0.54	0.84
$50,000 or more	1.00	1.00	1.00
Insurance status				0.0104
Uninsured	0.72	0.57	0.90
Public	0.69	0.50	0.95
Private	1.00	1.00	1.00
Cancer site				0.0709				0.0414
Breast	0.89	0.35	2.27		4.47	0.74	26.98
Cervix	1.08	0.48	2.40		2.80	0.34	22.90
Colorectal	0.69	0.41	1.17		4.22	0.98	18.18
Prostate	1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00	1.00

^ap value for F test from SUDAAN PROC LOGIST with site as stratum and clinic as PSU